Exploring the Socio-Economic Impacts of Blockchain Technology in the Accounting and Auditing Profession

Blockchain technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of accounting and auditing. It has several benefits, such as automating processes, managing identities and authentication more efficiently, providing real-time accounting and auditing, and reducing costs. However, there are also potential negative impacts that need to be considered, such as the possibility of job loss due to automation, heavy initial investment, lack of technical skills, and compatibility issues. Therefore, it is crucial to weigh both the pros and cons of adopting blockchain technology and take appropriate measures to mitigate any negative impacts.

Introduction

The world is currently experiencing the fourth industrial revolution, also known as Industry 4.0, thanks to the rapid development of technology. This revolution calls for automation in various industries, which has led to the need for blockchain technology. Blockchain technology has gained significant attention in recent years due to its potential to revolutionize multiple fields, including accounting and auditing. Its adoption in the accounting and auditing field has the potential to transform the way financial transactions are recorded and verified, which could have significant socio-economic consequences. The decentralized nature of blockchain ensures that transactions are secure, transparent, and tamper-proof, thereby reducing the risk of fraud and errors. Additionally, the technology\'s ability to automate accounting processes could increase efficiency and reduce organizational costs. Adopting blockchain technology in accounting and auditing could pave the way for a more accurate, reliable, and efficient financial reporting system. This article highlights the necessity and objectives of the study, presents the research findings and discussions, and concludes by synthesizing insights derived from the analysis.

Need of the Study and Objective

Although prior research has explored the technical aspects of blockchain technology and its potential applications in accounting, there is still a lack of research on the socio-economic impacts of implementing blockchain technology in accounting and auditing. Therefore, this study addresses this gap by examining the socio-economic impact of implementing blockchain technology in the accounting and auditing profession. In addition, a comprehensive review of literature aimed at assessing the socio-economic implications of integrating blockchain technology into the accounting and auditing sector.

Findings and Discussion:

The implementation of blockchain-based platforms in the accounting and auditing profession has the potential to make the job easier and more efficient. Every technological advancement has both its pros and cons. Similarly, blockchain technology has positive as well as negative impacts. This study summarizes the potential socio-economic impacts of this technology.

Table 1: Socio-economic Impact of Implementing Blockchain Technology in Accounting Profession

CategoryAuthorSocio-economic Impacts
Positive Impacts(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)Automation of business process
(Byrne & Lees, 2018)Effective identity and authentication management system
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)Establish an effective tracking and monitoring system
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017); (Cai, 2019)Self-enforcement and self-execution of the mutual agreement through a smart contract
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017); (Demirkan et al., 2020)Real-time accounting and auditing
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)Establish interoperability of accounting records
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)Manipulation or destroying accounting records practically impossible
(Demirkan et al., 2020)Reduced duplications of accounting records
(Demirkan et al., 2020)Improve transactional efficiency and transparency
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017); (Weigand et al., 2020)Enhance the auditability of accounting records
(Demirkan et al., 2020)Reduction in cost of accounting
Negative Impacts(Tysiac, 2017)Loss of jobs due to automation
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)Initially required heavy investment to establish such type of system
(Karajovic et al., 2019)Lack of such type of infrastructure
(Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017); (Cai, 2019)Lack of technical courses and training for accounting professionals
(Lagaras, 2018)Lack of compatibility with the existing system
(Surana et al., 2021)Enhance the monopoly of the big corporations

Source: Own Compilation

I. Positive Socio-economic Impacts of Blockchain Technology

  1. Automation of business process: Technology\'s rapid development in recent times has brought in industrial revolution 4.0, which requires automation in various industries, especially financial sectors. Blockchain technology helps to detect errors and fraud in accounting entries and automate transaction verification. Automation shifts the role of an accountant and an auditor from a collector and aggregator to a translator and analyst. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)
  2. Effective identity and authentication management system: Service providers use centralized architecture to authenticate users, but it is flawed since it relies on a single trust point. A decentralized blockchain-based approach eliminates the need for a middleman and provides cryptographically secure identities. (Byrne & Lees, 2018)
  3. Establish an effective tracking and monitoring system: One well-publicized use of blockchain technology is real-time tracking and monitoring of financial transactions. Blockchain would serve as the accounting information system in the ecosystem, distributing transaction verification, storage, and administration power among a group of computers to avoid illegal data modifications. The system could enable real-time tracking and monitoring of physical item activities while automating the recording and analysis of business performance by integrating emerging technologies. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)
  4. Self-enforcement and self-execution of the mutual agreement through a smart contract: Smart contracts could not be executed before the introduction of blockchain technology because different parties maintained different databases. Smart contracts perform themselves without a third-party intermediary using a shared blockchain technology-based database. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)
  5. Real-time accounting and auditing: Blockchain technology can enable real-time accounting by providing immediate access to accurate financial information. It reduces human errors, provides trustworthy updates in decentralized public ledgers, and allows near-real-time communication of accurate accounting data to interested parties. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017; Demirkan et al., 2020)
  6. Establish interoperability of accounting records: Blockchain interoperability enables blockchains to communicate and share data. It improves efficiency and transparency but requires standardization to avoid fragmentation and duplication of efforts. Governments can establish an infrastructure for local agencies to develop blockchain applications securely, facilitating collaborative standards development. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)
  7. Manipulation or destroying accounting records practically impossible: Blockchain is a distributed database that makes it difficult to tamper with or destroy accounting records. This technology provides prompt access to financial information for shareholders, creditors, business partners, government agencies, and other interested parties. Users can be granted specific access authorizations based on their jobs and expectations. Blockchain-based accounting information\'s transparency and verifiable nature can potentially boost shareholder trust. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)
  8. Reduced duplications of accounting records: Blockchain technology offers various essential features for accounting purposes. This technology allows companies to create entries or transactions into a shared register. Rather than keeping separate records based on transaction receipts, they may establish an interconnected system of permanent accounting records.
  9. Improve transactional efficiency and transparency: Blockchain is a database that consists of data blocks connected by algorithms. It provides immutable data and increases accuracy, transparency, fraud prevention, and cyber-attack resistance. Blockchain technology offers transparency and decentralization, which makes it almost impossible for accounting fraud to occur. It ensures the accuracy and trustworthiness of accounting information, and its unique operating mechanism prevents data tampering, securing information, and increasing credibility. (Demirkan et al., 2020)
  10. Enhance the auditability of accounting records: The auditability of information is a crucial aspect of blockchain technology. The blockchain ledger provides a secure data record and can authenticate multiple audit-related documents. For instance, if every inventory item arriving at a company\'s warehouse is registered on the blockchain and its location and condition are regularly updated, a detailed history of inventory items can be established. This feature enables real-time inventory inspection from a remote location. Additionally, audit trails can be recorded on the blockchain, making it easier to track and review them in the future. Similarly, electronic invoices, bills of lading, letters of credit, receipts, and other documents can be included in the blockchain, allowing auditors to verify the accuracy of financial data. These documents can be exchanged among linked parties. A blockchain-based accounting system can enhance the quality of the contents from an accounting standpoint and improve the system\'s auditability and interoperability. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017; Weigand et al., 2020)
  11. Reduction in accounting cost: In 2020, Irem Demirkan along with other authors stated that combining accounting and blockchain technology has a lot of potential benefits. It can enhance information integrity, lower transmission costs, speed up transaction settlement, and reduce fraud. As a result, implementing blockchain can make accounting and auditing practices more efficient and productive. Although the computational overhead of blockchain is still significant compared to a relational database, technological advancements are expected to lead to cost savings, allowing blockchain to become a widely used infrastructure for enterprise information systems and continuous auditing systems. (Demirkan et al., 2020)

II. Negative Socio-economic Impacts of Blockchain Technology

  1. Loss of jobs due to automation: Change is an inevitable part of life, but some people may find it difficult to accept, especially when it comes to new technologies like blockchain. People must adapt to this new technology to ensure their transactions are safe, secure, and completed. However, implementing such changes may pose challenges for personnel in any organization, and some may even lose their jobs. Companies must allocate resources to accommodate these new work patterns effectively. Developing new technologies can potentially threaten people\'s livelihoods in several fields. For example, the development of the internet made it challenging for newspaper writers to stay employed, and experts predict that self-driving trucks could result in massive employment losses for truck drivers. Similarly, blockchain has consequences for the accounting and auditing profession. (Tysiac, 2017)
  2. Initially required heavy investment to establish such type of system: Blockchain technology requires significant investments in financial and human resources. It involves drastic changes to corporate processes and requires a thorough cost-benefit analysis before implementation. The success of every blockchain project depends on careful evaluation of viability, practicality, and alignment with the company\'s business. Accounting professionals can be vital in providing essential advisory services and conducting cost-benefit analyses. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017)
  3. Lack of such infrastructure: It is important to note that some people may argue that the situations mentioned are not representative or that early and ongoing investments in infrastructure will outweigh any cost savings. It is essential to consider the unique characteristics of each company and industry. Before implementing blockchain technology, several factors need to be evaluated, such as the company\'s size, the nature of the business, the competitive environment, whether to develop the technology in-house or use other services, and the available financial resources. Each organization should compare the costs and benefits to determine if a technology suits their needs. (Karajovic et al., 2019)
  4. Lack of technical courses and training for accounting: The lack of blockchain development in accounting is due to a knowledge gap between blockchain developers and accounting professionals. Additionally, accounting professionals and researchers lack in-depth training in blockchain infrastructure, while blockchain specialists need help from accounting professionals to understand business and accounting needs. Managers, accountants, and auditors require training and support from IT specialists to use blockchain technology efficiently. Smart contract auditing is also a complex issue that requires a deep understanding of blockchain technology. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017; Cai, 2019)
  5. Lack of compatibility with the existing system: Innovation Diffusion Theory outlines five properties of innovation spread, including observability, trial ability, complexity, compatibility, and relative advantage. Blockchain technology has low levels of observability and compatibility, but it has much potential for utilization. However, there are practical issues with its compatibility with enterprise resource systems. Each node must be able to communicate with the shared blockchain and must agree on the shared network rules. (Dai & Vasarhelyi, 2017; Cai, 2019)
  6. Enhance the monopoly of the big corporations: In today\'s era of technology, a few large tech corporations hold monopolistic control over providing digital services. As India is a significant market for these companies, it is crucial to establish regulatory norms beforehand to prevent them from gaining too much influence. The concern is that giant corporations such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft could control and operate a digital infrastructure that impacts nearly every aspect of public life. The issue of Big Tech is no longer just a business concern but a broader problem due to the accelerated adoption of digitalization caused by COVID-19. It is time for India to take the lead in rethinking its regulatory framework and controlling Big Tech\'s power. (Surana et al., 2021)

Conclusion

Blockchain technology has significantly changed the accounting industry, offering rapid error detection and fraud prevention within accounting entries and automating transaction verification using data from business partners. The accountant\'s role evolves from collector and aggregator to translator and analyst as the recording and presentation process moves towards progressive automation. While technological advancements can threaten people\'s livelihoods in various fields, blockchain technology has positive and negative consequences for the accounting and auditing service industry. It requires companies to rebalance their workforce, trust their data in the public domain (even if encrypted), and persuade business partners to participate in an open-share environment. It should be done in tandem with traditional business systems such as ERPs, and large firms with several ERPs may need to invest significant resources to connect blockchain apps with each system.

Implementing blockchain technology in accounting requires significant changes in corporate processes, which can be challenging but offer long-term benefits. It is crucial to ensure a smooth transition that balances the benefits of blockchain with the impact on the workforce.

References:

  • Byrne, D., & Lees, D. (2018). Finance and accounting-beyond the numbers with self-leadership. In Contemporary Issues in Accounting: The Current Developments in Accounting Beyond the Numbers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91113-7_9
  • Cai, C. W. (2019). Triple-entry accounting with blockchain: How far have we come? Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12556
  • Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804
  • Deloitte. (2016). Blockchain Technology: A game-changer in accounting? https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/Innovation/Blockchain_A_game-changer_in_accounting.pdf
  • Demirkan, S., Demirkan, I., & McKee, A. (2020). Blockchain technology in the future of business cyber security and accounting. Journal of Management Analytics, 0(0), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1731721
  • Karajovic, M., Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2019). Thinking Outside the Block: Projected Phases of Blockchain Integration in the Accounting Industry. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12280
  • Lagaras, M. C. P. (2018). Changing the Landscape of Accounting using Blockchain Technology. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(5), 190-195. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.8.5.23
  • Surana, G., Bhanawat, S. S., & Chouhan, V. (2021). Measuring professionals\' perception on blockchain-based futuristic accounting. In Blockchain 3.0 for Sustainable Development (pp. 89-100). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110702507-006
  • Tysiac, K. (2017). Blockchain: An opportunity for accountants? Or a threat? Journal of Accountancy. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2017/nov/blockchain-opportunity-for-accountants-201717900.html
  • Weigand, H., Blums, I., & Kruijff, J. de. (2020). Shared Ledger Accounting Implementing the Economic Exchange pattern. Information Systems, 90, 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.101437
Authors may be reached at gouravsurana7@gmail.com and eboard@icai.in